Did not Socrates say: "The undocumented life is not worth living"?

The Prophetic Witness of Clarence Kinzler (1935-2023)

Tribute at the Memorial Service of Clarence J. Kinzler “The boy is more important than the rule.”    The prophetic witness of Clarence “Cla...

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Lewis’s Four ‘Bleats’ in the field of Cambridge


I'm only “a sheep telling other sheep what only sheep can tell them.”--"Modern Theology and Biblical Criticism”  (1959)[1]

Having spent these past two weeks in Wales, wandering through green pastures around Hawarden Castle, and reading and teaching a seminar on C. S. Lewis and Alec Vidler in the 19th century "Temple of Learning" at Gladstone’s Residential Library, I offer a tiny piece from my course on miracles in the Bible.  

Here is a hoof-print from Lewis’s ‘four fine bleats’ against modern criticism of the Bible from a lecture he gave to faculty and seminary students at Cambridge University in 1959.  He says he’s just “a sheep telling other sheep what only sheep can tell them,” and his ‘bleats” are still relevant today.

Dr. Alec Vidler, Anglican priest, former Warden of Gladstone Residential Library, and then Dean of the Chapel at Kings College, Cambridge, had delivered a sermon entitled “The Sign at Cana” in which he lifted up the spiritual significance of Jesus’s turning water into wine at a wedding—a spiritual ‘sign’ he said and not a supernatural miracle--and called for a more secular faith and demythologized form Christianity for modern times.  In response, Professor C. S. Lewis gave a Monday morning talk on modern theology and biblical criticism in the Common Room of Wescott House (the more liberal seminary community at Cambridge).  Vidler and Lewis remained friendly, but represent two quite different and opposing views of Christian faith, characterized as “modernist/liberal” and “conventional/conservative.”

During the talk, Lewis bellied out his four major bleats, summarized as follows: 

1.     Some biblical critics lack literary judgment; they read between the lines of ancient texts, reconstruct its supposed sources and shaping influences, not understanding literary genres (e.g., reading John’s Gospel as a romance rather than reportage of historical events and remembrances)

2.     Some claim without good reasons that the real teachings of Christ came rapidly to be misunderstood, and only now have been recovered by modern scholars (Vidler is an example)

3.     Some claim that miracles don’t occur in nature, based on their presupposition that belief in the supernatural is not reasonable or tenable.

4.     Critical attempts to recover the origin or pre-history of an ancient text (in Plato, Shakespeare or the Bible) are suspect, based on the fact that critics almost always get it wrong when they try to reconstruct the sources of many modern writers, including Lewis’s writings and those of his friends.

Here’ a taste in the page images below, of Lewis’s light touch and artful way of engaging his more liberal critics (most of whom were in training to become shepherds of churches):

“I find in these theologians a constant use of the principle that the miraculous does not occur, thus any statement put into our Lord’s mouth by the old texts, which, if He had really made it, would constitute a prediction of the future, is taken to have been put in after the occurrence which it seemed to predict.  This is very sensible if we start by knowing that inspired prediction can never occur.   Similarly in general, the rejection as unhistorical of all passages which narrate miracles, is sensible if we start by knowing that the miraculous in general never occurs. 

Now, I do not here want to discuss whether the miraculous is possible. I only want to point out that this is a purely philosophical question.  Scholars as scholars speak on it with no more authority than anyone else.  The canon ‘if miraculous, unhistorical’ is one they bring to their study of the texts, not one they have learned from it.  If one is speaking of authority, the united authority of all the biblical critics in the world counts here for nothing.  On this they speak simply as men, obviously influenced by and perhaps insufficiently critical of the spirit of the age they grew up in.”   But my fourth bleat which is also my loudest and longest is still to come…"


[1] “…the proper study of shepherds is sheep not save accidentally other shepherds and woe to you if you do not evangelize. I am not trying to teach my grandmother, I am a sheep telling shepherds what only a sheep can tell them.  And now I start my bleating…”  Lewis, C. S. “Modern Theology and Biblical Criticism” in Christian Reflections, Walter Hooper, ed.

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

“A Light Touch, A Tad of Humor”


Lewis’s Last Interview:  “A Light Touch, A Tad of Humor”

“God has shown us that he can use any instrument.  Balaam’s ass, you remember, preached a very effective sermon in the midst of his ‘hee-haws.’” – C. S. Lewis, The Final Interview, May 7, 1963[1] 

In my research this week in prep for my course at Gladstone’s Library, I discovered C.S. Lewis’ last known interview, on May 7, 1963 (six months before he died), conducted by Sherwood Eliot Wirt for Decision Magazine (published by the Billy Graham Association. 

I remember meeting young Sherwood n 1968 or 69. He was offering a writing workshop in Pasadena for young would-be writers like myself, and I remember paying the fee and attending his workshop on “How to Publish Your Book.”  I was 15 at the time hoping to write and publish my first book on “God and Flying Saucers.”  What a surprise this week to find his name attached to Lewis's final interview.

One of Sherwood’s questions to Lewis’s was about his use of subtle satire and light humor, which comes through in his writings.

Wirt: A light touch has been characteristic of your writings, even when you are dealing with heavy theological themes. Would you say there is a key to the cultivation of such an attitude?

Lewis: “I believe this is a matter of temperament. However, I was helped in achieving this attitude by my studies of the literary men of the Middle Ages, and by the writings of G.K. Chesterton. Chesterton, for example, was not afraid to combine serious Christian themes with buffoonery. In the same way the miracle plays of the Middle Ages would deal with a sacred subject such as the nativity of Christ, yet would combine it with a farce.”

Wirt: Should Christian writers, then, in your opinion, attempt to be funny?

Lewis: “No. I think that forced jocularities on spiritual subjects are an abomination, and the attempts of some religious writers to be humorous are simply appalling. Some people write heavily, some write lightly. I prefer the light approach because I believe there is a great deal of false reverence about.... God has shown us that he can use any instrument. Balaam’s ass, you remember, preached a very effective sermon in the midst of his ‘hee-haws.’”   [See Numbers 22:21-39]

[What I would have asked him]So, Jack, what was Balaam’s ass’s sermon about?”

Lewis:  Donkey’s Delight! he would have answered.

Lewis wrote a poem about his personal identification with Balaam’s ass entitled “Donkey’s Delight”—which is also the title and theme of my Travel Blog (see my original post).

A light touch, a tad of satire, self-effacing humor is characteristic of Lewis’s writings about heavy matters: like sex and morality, heaven and, hell, angels and demons, and, of course, the End of the World.

In the spirit of Balaam’s ass, I offer one of Lewis’s light responses when an another interviewer asked him a heavy question in 1953 about the new development of the hydrogen bomb and a possible nuclear apocalypse:

“Civilizations since the 11th century have been expecting the world to come suddenly and painfully to an immediate end….And anyhow, when the bomb falls there will always be just that split second in which one can say ‘Pooh!  You’re only a bomb.  I’m an immortal soul.’”

More seriously, “when the end is near, how shall we then live?”

Lewis said he agreed with William Morris: “…the answer is to simply to get on with the job—to mend the sails, or launch the boat, or gather firewood.”

I love his light touch on heavy matters.   #DonkeysDelight



[1] “The Final Interview” with C.S. Lewis, Decision Magazine, May 7, 1963.

Travel